Ambassador of the USA to Slovakia
I hereby approach you and the Government of the USA with a request and hope that the worldwide controversy over the questions I raise in my book “Theory of Truth” will help to promote the concept of human fellowship and of the unified global nation, because in the sense of my book, this is possible – see www.theorytruth.com for details. Even if that option fails to succeed in the long term, in the short term, over the next twenty years, the world will have to still deal with a possible breakup of China or the displacement of the United States on the periphery of the world events of an uncertain future for the state of Israel, the solution still being in the concept of the global nation. The concomitant phenomenon of the China-US collision will be disappearance of transformation of the energy sector into a technologically one with a dramatic revaluation of the capitalization of the economies of the Western civilization, which will drastically change the price mechanism with all the consequences for the world’s wealth and thus the standard of living in the most advanced economies of the world. Another unavoidable phenomenon is that the socio-political climate in Europe shows strong signs of similarity to the climate on the eve of the Great French Revolution, the consequences of which none of the Europeans really want to experience, but which are necessary unless they can be avoided. I am addressing this open letter, including the extract from my book in the Appendix to this letter, to all of your colleagues from the European Union, based in Slovakia, China, Russia, India, Ukraine and Israel, and will, of course, be provided to the world media.
In Bratislava, dated 15 October 2018
Supplement: Application of the “Theory of Truth” to global politics
The Slovak proverb says, “I am judging you by myself,” therefore the fools want to include US President Donald Trump among themselves. If Trump did not ordain the world according to Donald, it would be the world according to Barack. And what would the world by Barack be like? As stated in my book, the integrity of human society in the upward direction is based on straddle transfer of genes across generations, and in the lateral direction it is based on the privatization of man, bloodline, and economic resources on the part of the woman, creating thus the society of primeval woman. Consequently, these relationships are developed on the basis of the social accumulation of resources caused by the development of agriculture, creating a society of improbus woman. This develops into the society of a fertile woman thanks to the private accumulation of resources from foreign trade, which completes the development of today’s civilization. Most likely, Barack Obama also knew that the future accumulation of resources would be taking place in Eurasia and that corresponds to the project of the Global Economic Motorway, euphemistically called the “Silk Road”. But the problem with the US is that they were, are and will be an island, so future value-creating and accumulation develop outside the US and their domination at sea will only be “wasted resources” from the perspective of the future. The world, according to Barack is based on ideology, but the project of linking the European Union and China is purely economic, therefore Barack’s approach from the part of China has been rejected. The naivety of the concept of the ideological division of the world in the economic sphere is unrealistic because it is an attempt to combine two incongruous things as if Barack wanted to put on a ragged coat on the body/skin where the rag cannot stand the dynamics of the biological body/economy. In addition, the ideology of Barack’s world is not even inherently consistent, because, as detailed in the book, it links the Californian scientific atheism (neo-communism), the Texan Old-German Gnosticism (presented in the book preview at www.theorytruth.com), and New York globalization, i.e. the uncontrolled transnational egoism of super predators. In the book, the state of mind is analyzed when the consciousness moves in a virtual reality/state without verification of the conformity between the reality and the statement, and this produces psychological disturbances, and in the social sphere it allows the activity of individuals such as beasts and swine (these are not pejorative expressions but a kind of technical term as defined in the book). They are recognizable by how police investigators recognize the liars, by them all repeating the same things without their personal input in the description of reality. Ideology in conjunction with the economy is ineffective, like a rag coat sewn to the skin is full of sweat, it stinks, rots, and tears to pieces as the body keeps moving and growing, whether due to activity, obesity, or muscle growth. Barack’s policy reflected the geographical conditions by ideological blockages of Iran/Persia, Russia and Ukraine, because the journey between China and the European Union is divided in one of its parts into the Barents Sea, Russia, the Caspian Sea, Iran, and the Arabian Sea, and in the second part it is blocked by Scandinavia with the Baltic Sea(1) and Poland(2), Ukraine, and the Black Sea. The sign that ideology is inefficient in the economy is entering into the nuclear “Barack” treaty with Iran. It is, on the one hand, a manifestation of goodwill towards China, but for logical reasons it has gone to the brink on the other. It is precisely the position of Persia that inspired Cyrus the Great to launch the first civilization revolution in the 6th century B. C. (discussed in the book); this was the flaw/weakness of the USA, and considering the rational response of Russia to the US power pressure, it then implied enormous pressure on Ukraine, which was similar to putting a bottle of Champaign on a cooker. Fortunately enough, human civilization disposes with its existing self-regulatory mechanisms that correct human stupidity, at it is at such moments in time when the world according to Donald is starting to emerge. President Donald Trump’s economic policy could be characterized as capital mercantilism, the essence of which is to block the processes of internal capital formation in the economy of undesirable competitors. For the sake of clarification, it is necessary to dig deep into the history of economic theory, where it is necessary to explain at first how the price is created in the closed economy. David Ricardo has developed the theory of value and proved that in an economy, price formation ultimately stabilizes all the sectors at the same rate of profit, which includes the remuneration for all the sources of the producer, including those that do not acquire it from commodity-money relations, but activate them from their environment and for the economy they have the character of “newcomers”. For example, raw materials owned by a producer, other commodities, annually economically “newly emerged” is agricultural production and, of course, the most important thing is human work together with knowledge or/or technology. Consequently, classical mercantilism asserts that in the economy the final volume of currency is used to cover transactions between producers and consumers. Since no producer has an undue profit concentration, then the accumulation of currency in the economy means also the growth of economic activity associated with the growth of wealth. Another, in Western economics lesser known theory, is the concept of “comparative advantages of foreign trade”, which in the former Eastern European Communist countries found the theoretical justification for the dumped export prices of the goods produced in these socialist economies, because the foreign exchange thus obtained allowed the import of deficient goods. Subsequently, scarce goods allow the full range of domestic goods to be developed, and then include an average profit rate that capitalizes the entire economy, which at the same time compensates for the loss of export earnings at undervalued prices. All three of these theoretical bases are underlying constructs for my “qualitative money theory,” the analogy of which I use in the structure of my book, on the contribution of foreign trade to the growth of human civilization. So the effect of foreign trade on the wealth growth on imports means completing the supply of goods and thereby increasing the added value in the economy at the level of average profitability from the full structure of the goods, i.e. from a larger underlying basis, and export provides additional capitalization in the form of a revaluation of the “newly discovered” goods, which are no longer valued solely on the basis of the average profit rate in the national economy, but also on the basis of the value-creation process into which the exported goods engage in the most advanced import economy into which the goods are exported. Then the starting point of classical mercantilism, that money is important in its function of circulation, has proven to be wrong, but the function of money as a preserver of value, which is the definition of capital, is the “holy grail” of the economic policy of the State or the source of the growth of wealth.
All those who will say that Donald Trump knows next to nothing about the theoretical fundamentals of foreign trade are right. Because I have not published my work as yet, and no one has ever seen foreign trade from this perspective, then also the critics of the US President know nothing about it. Unlike them, Donald Trump personally met Ivan Boesky, and he certainly saw at least once Oliver Stone’s “Wall Street” movie, where Gordon Gekko attacked the Bluestar sub-capitalized airliner. Donald Tramp certainly knows what the intrinsic value of the shares means, the capitalization of the company and the fundamental analysis of the company, which in turn is the microeconomic justification of capitalization through foreign trade at the macroeconomic level. Based on his experience, he has assessed that China is “a company suitable for takeover”. In the event that Donald Trump would not have made this internal decision and the world would continue according to Barack, even during his life, in about twenty years ahead from now, the US would become an island, and Moscow would replace New York as the World Finance Center, and Vienna would replace London. For Trump’s personality trait, it is unacceptable to be a Donald “from the back of beyond” and not from New York/the navel of the world. It was amazing to see Donald Trump in the United Nations, where, despite the mournfulness of the unconscious, he danced his walk through the vestibule” as his Majesty’s flagship in the harbor. He in fact knew what the others did not know; namely, that another Slovak proverb holds: “The lash whips at its end”. The instinct of the predator commands one to prepare for a pre-leap position, and it is necessary to respect the conditions because Barack Obama, as a “severance”, has left behind sanctions against Russia and the crisis in Ukraine. That is why Donald Trump did not have to uncover his intentions and fight the “fools” of the Barack world, and he put an even stronger pressure on Russia. Therefore, he cannot negotiate with the Russians about the “trading” share, which could also split the risk, but he has to create “trade” by buying services from the Russians. Barack Obama has damaged the United States in two ways, but this is logical, because his world is virtual and is based on ideology (see the book for details). He displaced the creative Russians, and they, in turn, began to organize their State on the basis of the lowest costs, by rendering support to the Orthodox Church and the family, by giving hope and satisfaction to the people (the issue of inner tensions is addressed in the book). The feeling of eliminating the existential tension is resolved by “miraculous weapons” that disable has any chance of the US winning in any military campaign in the world. What is worse is that, through sanctions, the Russians can capitalize their economy by activating “newly discovered sources”, such as by developing agriculture and diversifying gas pipeline connections to all the relevant economic centers, especially the European Union, while relieving pressure on Iran. Thanks to the “cards” given by Barack Obama when marginalizing Russia, the US will have to accept the price of Russia for its services only if the offer were in resolving the problem of Ukraine. The essence of China’s “take-over game” is that it can cut off goods flows to the most advanced markets to decapitalize China. This was largely successful in the first phase of Chinese export sales to the US, as reciprocal Chinese tariffs further distort value-creating/product flows in the Chinese business sphere, but the effect on the US is tolerable. Capitalization of the US economy is based on services, mainly due to the US dollar reserve and settlement function and the intellectual property trade mainly associated with the software. In the second phase, which is “hypothetical,” it is most likely to address the issue of human rights, the protection of intellectual property, and companies that support/trade in Chinese goods will be sanctioned. The decline in export earnings will cause a debt crisis for Chinese companies, which will lead to the binding of public funds to maintain the financial stability of microeconomics, there will be a drop in investment by both domestic public investment funds, as resources will be debt-related and then foreign, as the earnings from the and the EU will be significantly reduced, and new investments will not be needed and domestic consumption will already be served by the existing production capacities. Therefore, foreign investors will repatriate dividends in order to minimize their losses. As the first, home entrepreneurs would want to save themselves by trying to move their production to “safer and cheaper” destinations, thereby completing the conditions for repeating the scenario of a similar end to the Soviet Union. It is good for the US to moderate trade between the EU and China, which can only be achieved by keeping both of the Eurasian economic centers in a weak state of “chronic disease”, which can be achieved in China by decapitalizing its economy, and in the case of the EU by the exchange of “ideological” Western European leaders co-opted by Barak Obama for the nation-oriented, but “grounded” (based on a disparaging example of the impacts of Brexit without agreement). These are readily recognizable as they repeat one and the same opinion as if they were hypnotized or unlawful, and someone had written for them in advance what to say. As a result, the US can proceed in Europe according to the Roman: “Divide and Rule”. The philosophical base of elite exchange, which is completely natural to Donald Trump, is based on the best American business tradition to give the customer what he expects to have. The customer certainly does not expect that when he invests his electoral vote, which is actually his personal social capital, there will be no response from today’s elites, so he will get a sense of deception and robbery, which is the nature of the crime of fraud. The practical performance of “nationalization” and the exchange of European elites for the world by Donald Trump is carried out by in Europe by his former advisor, Steve Bannon. Before anybody starts to “demonize” nationalism, he should read my book and understand the difference between the nation in the sense of the ethnicity that arose in the 19th century and the nation in terms of status, which allows, based on the principle of the last instance, where the individual can still at least mitigate the negative effects of social forces on his/her existential tension. At the same time, this explains the emergence and extinction of all the human civilizations, but at the same time this mechanism allows for the future, maybe 100 years, to understand the creation of a single global nation on the Earth. The charm of Donald’s world is that it creates a space for its New Yorkers/super predators/globalists that is totally natural and would guide their work for humanity in a positive direction. Of course, this will not suit the type of globalists who, in the spirit of conspiracy theories, have the ambition of controlling their national States according to their own volition, and at the same time being inviolable, what is the position “alone against the world”, whose ultimate solution is the nuclear apocalypse. On the contrary, by creating the prerequisites for a global nation based on rational behavior under the rules of the capital markets, where they are the strongest “New Yorkers”, the US will maintain itself as the main “moral” governing body of the world. This ambition will mean a loss of the US dollar settlement curve, but the US will oversee the fact that actors in the creation of a new clearing system outside the US dominance will accept a common control procedure. The following facts are hypothetical; in the matter of an international autonomous settlement system, the US will advocate that, for example, countries connected to terrorism or unfair commercial practices cannot benefit from foreign trade with the developed countries, but the most important condition will be to achieve full currency convertibility, but without adopting a system of protection against unjustified attacks by private funds the international community will not be willing to accept. At the same time, the US will not allow settlement systems to be created outside of their influence without meeting this condition. A compromise may be in the protection for those economies and States that demonstrate the purely economic nature of the financial transfers that are being transferred, otherwise they will have to undertake capital markets oversight over the rational economic policies of their governments. If they get the internal economy into imbalances, they will be “punished” by the strong economic and social impacts of monetary attacks, leading to the rationalization of the world community and the promotion of “values” of the efficiency and protection of the planet’s resources. If the status quo remained that of Barack Obama, where free Iran would trigger the then uncontrollable economic forces that would result in the escalation of the Eurasian arteries, in particular the Russian rail corridor – the Trans-Siberian Highway and the shipping over Russian territorial waters in the Northern Arctic Ocean. Then, in order to make China not dependent on Russia alone, and at the same time it could have avoided the US Maritime Corps, it would certainly seek to build and dominate the infrastructure through Central Asia, ideally the route through Afghanistan and Iran, continuing with alternative routes through Turkey or Iraq and Syria. At the same time, Russia, to be independent from China, would certainly support the Indian railway corridor Bombay, Karachi, Tehran, Baku to Volgograd, where it would be linked to the Trans-Siberian Highway and the extremely interesting Bombay, Karachi, Tehran, Yerevan, Sochi and the Kerch Bridge with a highway network linking Europe to India and Europe for foreign trade for small and medium-sized enterprises with a dramatic capitalization of all the participating economies and for Russia, with the opening of the billion-dollar logistics and financial services sector.
The problem of China’s “takeover” is a non-trivial one, because if the world interconnects and will try to abolish the position of the dollar as a settlement currency by supporting alternative clearing systems, central banks outside the EU will begin converting dollar reserves into other assets. At the same time, these governments will start financing their public debts in their respective national currencies. For the United States, achieving targets will be challenging, with all of them in the long term beginning to secretly working on the US decapitalization, which will result in a de-ideologization of US policy, resulting in rationalization of the world order. Furthermore, the exertion of pressure on China will lead, given the fact that it is not completely open and has had a larger scope of measures of asymmetric nature, to its orientation towards the EU middle-sized enterprises that are unrelated to the US. China will have to focus on serving the client in smaller volumes, shorter delivery times, and higher quality deliveries, so it will have to reorient itself to Russian corridors, such as the Trans-Siberian Highway with a translation in Petersburg on container ships to Hamburg and Rotterdam or to sea transport in the North Ice Ocean in the mare of Russia. China will certainly find “correct accounting operations” to maintain its business sphere in a relatively “good shape”, for example, it will take over the domestic corporate debt, extend maturity, and devalue the yuan to ease domestic debt service payments from low domestic sales. However, foreign firms will not be able to repatriate the devalued Yuan, so they either go to the barter, de facto export from China on their behalf, or choose to sell their production capacities in China, and China can compensate for its losses. In addition to solving its economic problems, geostrategic problems will also need to be addressed. In Iran, it must ensure that the economy is not collapsing and destabilizing the State in a similar regime to Syria, which would mean a long-term and protracted war-humanitarian conflict throughout Asia with global implications. In Ukraine, on the contrary, there is an open war or dictatorship. Ukrainian central government does not trust international financial institutions because it cannot transparently declare the use of resources, so Ukraine is “spreading” money only on the basis of ideology, and hence it is cheaper to activate the nationalist circles in the west of Ukraine that have problems with Jews, Poles, but especially with the Russians. That is why China, in order to make the response from its side the cheapest and most effective, should support the standard of living of Ukrainians. If the Chinese have “bought” the industry or joint venture with the Ukrainian oligarchs, they have been interested in implementing at least a twenty-year “silk plan” on the development of rail, road, water and air infrastructure, oil/gas/electricity pipelines. Only they have the power to push through the democratic elections of candidates who will be able to tackle the Ukrainian crisis in a peaceful way, and which should result in the simultaneous elimination of the power positions of today’s line of political leaders as well as those emerging from Western Ukraine. The new garniture could bring a room for federalism to the tried-and-tested Ukraine where the central government would have exclusive competence in finance and economics, at the same time foreign policy oriented towards the European Union and ultimately security and justice. On the contrary, everything else, including the limitation of the sovereignty of federalized Ukraine, would be subject to the right of veto of each of its federal states. In the science sphere, China should focus on reducing its oil dependence, as its price rises are the most squeezing of capital from the economy; there would be China’s immediate solution to importing mainly Iranian crude oil for long-term stable prices. Relief, with a special impact on Earth’s climate rescue, would mean the cesium reactor would be operational. Then the price of oil could not depend on transport, that is, from the wealth flowing from global foreign trade, but only from its use in the value-producing processes in which it is being processed.(3) Despite the fact that the world governed by capitalization of the economy is cruel because anything, though from good moves, if it is inefficient, it will have harsh consequences for any country that is not closed as North Korea or Saudi Arabia, and will want to participate in the “pleasures” of the global prosperity, freedom, and personal happiness. For the US, as the most capitalized economy, it will mean that they will still be the most important actor in the world that will determine values and standards, but at the same time, as everyone will know the rules, if the US is just trying to act on a fake/ideology, all the capital or the ultimate solution that the whole planet must hope for, will not happen. Conversely, if the US proceeds on the basis of truth, and given the advancement in space technologies, which “launches” space foreign trade, it will almost completely dominate the capitalization on the Earth. Reasonable people say that “there is good in every evil,” so it is necessary to look at the sanctions against Russia optimistically and to use the “covenants” that they face against competitive pressure and start using the domestic resources in the Russian economy, to invite “creative colonists, “such as the South African Buri or the Italians, who bring new procedures, kinds of goods, employ the Russian population who can use the acquired experience for their own business, but the colonists will also bring the export background. Russians can start creating incubators without the competition for the technology they have from their space and military research, which opens them with other export potential, and the like.
Apart from the economy, the Russians will have to solve their long-standing political problem in the succession process, which is also discussed in the book. In the first place, they should define the values for which it is worth “to die” and which should be part of patriotic education, while at the same time they should be the criterion of selecting suitable successors and then their goal in their application policy practice, for example, “Truth, Justice, and Love.” The book deals with parliamentary democracy and constitutional monarchy, but these constitutional arrangements are inappropriate for the powers where the leadership system must work, for which a presidential or a mixed system is more suitable. The formal aspect of the succession process can be inspiring in France, the US, and the Vatican. As stated in the book, it is first necessary to exclude persons from among the persons aspiring at winning their absolute authority who would certainly fail to perform their duties due to lack of loyalty to the throne/tribe/nation, and this provided a bloodline that was “blessed” by the second pillar of power – the Church, which became the successor line untouchable for usurpers. Modern society has replaced the bloodline/first pillar with the system of absolute authority and highest authority of public resource management, and the two power centers have their own brakes and levers, while the second pillar of power has been replaced by the ad hoc authority, the will of the people in the elections. It is not appropriate to divide the positions of the highest authority and the resource manager, so another principle of eliminating the offenders from the competition has to be put in place because their entry into the presidential function would mean the total destruction of such a society. The US presidential system is the analogy of the Roman Emperor and the inappropriate/disloyal candidates exclude the primary election system, during which the “lower stream” of the American politics will only let the loyal candidates pass through in the nomination for one of two political parties, and they are “washed in the dirt” so much that they have no longer a chance of underestimating the prestige of the US Presidential Office when they are nominated for election. The mixed presidential system in France is analogous to the Egyptian pharaoh or Chinese emperor, and more suited to the concept of the natural society as described in the book, but the selection of suitable candidates is non-transparent, totally subordinate to the “undercurrent of power”. For example, the last two French presidents were elected in a way that the main candidates who showed signs of authority were discredited with services and engagement of journalism because it is said that Dominique Strauss-Kahn was accused of sexual harassment by a hotel room maid who turned out to be an agent of secret services, and Francois Fillon was again accused of favoring his family, with his wife having regularly been performing her husband’s job, but she should have been doing so for free. Instead, Francois Mitterrand ordered his own assassination, and ordered the murder of the assassin, who, when he found out what was going on, went to give his testimony at the police, but the police, along with engaged journalism, “cleaned” the demo of Mitterrand’s character into the background. The “bottom stream” of French top politics has to be found in the circles and services that have been engaged in the Vichy France, as Francois Mitterrand worked at the secret service where the legend about the “Priority of Zionism” was being prepared, and his work can be learned from the sources that deal with the “Holy Grail” project, which is also mentioned in the book. The most stable of the past 2000 years is the system of the highest authority of the Catholic Church – the Pope in the Vatican. Its stability lies in the fact that it does not make it possible for the Pontifical Church to reach the candidates who do not go through the long-term test/life of unity of spiritual and physical devotion to the Church, and yet it is not enough, because they still have to be named the leading/basic/supportive/cardinal, the pope himself. Then, this group of electors of the new pope among themselves, the cardinals, no longer needs a “bottom stream” of control to get a person disloyal to the Church to the position of supreme authority, but can keep all its candidates transparently in public control. Lessons for Russia: it would be a shame to miss the chance of their de-idealized society not to try to create a perfect State based on transparency and natural order. The Russians are certainly creative, but for example, political parties that get at least 10% of the votes in the election could each year receive every 10% (the parties could also make coalitions to avoid a mandate) the honorable position of “Cardinal Russian” by the president in office, and in addition to political parties, every area would try to find a suitable candidate, because even if he has no chance to become President of Russia, but someone in their neighborhood can go to “Moscow Conclave” and become part of history. Of course, Russia is a super power, so that “cardinals of Russia” would, in addition to public scrutiny, be under the aegis of secret service, and it would be almost impossible to influence the long-term moral living patriot in choosing an inappropriate candidate for a political party or a coalition of parties because primaries would have to concentrate “at the conclave” of at least one hundred voters/cardinal Russians and a primate in the form of a conclave (a closed election without contact with the outside world, of course, especially party officials) would become candidates for general popular elections. In the book, besides the process of succession, I also refer to the problem of the acceptable life of a common man because of the functioning of a parallel/dark society, an oprichnina, thanks to which it is illusory to reach a fair life for an ordinary Russian in a fair world. To resolve this problem, it is necessary to go back to France, where King Louis XIV, in order to overcome the various rebellions and conspiracies of his nobility, forced them staying in his court in Paris. Similarly, for example, Russia can make an “offshore” area of the Crimea for natural persons to enjoy a 0% income tax, for legal persons income from property and property rights (holding of any assets and royalties) and foreign trade outside the Russian Federation 10% tax and capital charge (interest, stock and commodity exchange including derivatives) for all types of people at 1%, while Russian residents would not have to spend more than 179 nights out of Crimea on the territory of the Russian Federation, otherwise they would have to tax under wider rules to avoid in-depth auditing and possible liability for tax evasion. Such a concentration of “predators” will supervise themselves in their “courts” for a fair arrangement of circumstances, because if misdeeds are taking place, the “wolf” does not take into account the absent ones, and therefore for the Crimea-based oligarchs it will be best to pay attention to the general observance of law, so that in the absence of their assets their property is not the subject of a distribution. On a hypothetical level, the continuation of the US pressure on China and China’s knowledge of the need to de-legitimize the functioning of the State because it is inefficient will lead to a permanent lagging behind the United States and reformed Russia, which could force the Chinese Communist Party to consider following the Russian example of where the immediate by- product will be the organization of Chinese society on the basis of justice and respect for human rights.
Donald Trump’s push to de-ideologize gives the chance to live in the truth, i.e. to get rid of intellectual garbage in the form of gender nihilism, deviant aberrations, and scientific atheism. I have my book read, among others, by two atheists who were proclaiming the priority of science, but after reading it, they unanimously confirmed to me that they did not realize the importance of Christianity in the formatting of the worldview of every human being as a basis for the peaceful coexistence of human civilization, the significance of monotheism and Christian scholasticism for the development of paradigmatic science, and what was particularly pleasing, they no longer insisted on their atheism, but one of them used the notion that he was in fact a “cultural Christian”. The book goes even further in defining the so-called “technological” god for the purposes of formal logic used in the construction of paradigmatic science based on the greatest mystery of the Christianity – of the Trinity of God in terms of IDU, the identity of duality and utility, the facts that make up the reality of being, which is more closely dealt with in the book. The aim is to overcome the rigidity of the concept of scientific atheism that ignores the forces of an intangible nature without which there would be no integrity of material existence. That is why the book extends what is, that is, material being, to the reality of reality. The subsequent step has a logical conclusion in the form of scientific theism or the unity of the revealed/Christian and the learned/paradigmatic truth. One of the most beautiful paradoxes of creating my book at all is the truth or “vision” given by the two power groups that are defined entirely at the bottom of the world, and which drank from the same source of knowledge, but one from the period of the Middle Kingdom of Egypt up to the King Sedekias and the other after returning from Babylonian captivity. Their dominance is linked to the shift of foreign trade from the Mediterranean to the Atlantic Ocean as the Jewish bankers from the Republic of Venice having moved to London and established the banking district of the City. In connection with the advent of Jewish bankers, enlightenment and capital come to medieval England, but save for a few State bankruptcies by Philip II, the King of Spain(4), most likely, the bankers would not “cut” their best customer – the Spanish Crown, “the empire where the Sun does not set”. Simply, when the bankers decided to teach the power of the world that “it is worthy to pay”, with no point of return any longer, and this knowledge of Philip II broke down when he understood why he had lost a naval battle in 1588 with England, which began the gradual retreat of Spain from its previous world domination, and the knowledge was that it would not be possible to do politics on debt and on the basis of ideology without the provision of capital coverage.
Finally, bankers moved to the US, which after the World War II raised to the position of hegemony instead of England, and, of course, American elites have taken over from British loyalty to the Jews and patronage over the State of Israel, but at the same time bankers were protecting the US to prevent the US from losing the hegemony of the world. Barack Obama’s signature of a “Nuclear Treaty” with Iran probably did not even know what he was doing for the US, having exposed his country to the threat of going to the periphery of the world, and thereby endangering Israel’s security. That is why, among the American political elites, Donald Trump has withdrawn from it, as it is generally known to be supported by the American Jewish community. All that “sham” against President Donald Trump from the Democrats is the “bleating” of the wretched sheep (a technical term as defined in the book, not a pejorative expression) that cannot explain what is going on, and, on the contrary, when the pressure on living a life in lies has ceased, and people got to choose a natural leader/alpha male, so of course they gave him his vote. Because of his nature, Donald Trump is a “hardware fuse” to prevent the US from slipping into a zone from where there is no return, and its truthfulness is given by its naturalness. That’s why Donald Trump is part of the auto-correction mechanism of redirecting our human civilization and it’s up to people to use a narrow window to improve our prospects for the future. His naturalness and the resulting authenticity/truthfulness is invincible, because “mystery is the strongest weapon of the mighty, but the truth is the strongest weapon of the weak”!
(1) It is mentioned in the book with regard to ideological, geographical, and economic barriers.
(2) Ideological antagonism with Russia is given by the fact that the Poles were the only ones in history who captured Moscow regularly, besides being the Tatars conquered it by betrayal, and then they settled in the Crimea, where Stalin moved them from the Crimean “Rocks” to the oil fields – “the paradox of history”, then the tsar Alexander I surrendered Moscow to Napoleon without a fight.
(3) “The “Cesium Reactor” is used as a term for the experimental extraction of energy from isotopes of elements, and in the 1930s trials with the cesium isotopes were being made. I know that there is already a heat source that changes the nickel isotope 59 to the nickel isotope 64, its procurement costs are half the heat pump and are operating at around 250 euros for 2 years. A similar heat source can be used to generate steam for high-pressure turbines of any power, the fastest possible in shipping and operating costs would be about 500 thousand euros for 2 years where the re-engineering of motorization could run at the 5-year horizon and would save about 8% of oil consumption a year with significant healing climatic impact on Earth. Among other things, it would be possible to use it in marketing and to guarantee an ecological transport to demand a mark-up in the amount of tariff barriers; for 10 years it is possible to install isotope reactors with low-power electric turbines in the towns on the roofs of their homes to jointly solve the network fluctuations associated with the peak, the self-sufficiency of homes in electricity, from the waste heat heating the flats and the supply to the network will allow self-government to save on electricity for lighting and communal consumption, for which the communal consumption will be free to maintain a control panel and interconnection nodes; the result would be immediate closure of all coal and mazut power plants. Rail transport is also solvable over the 10-year horizon, as the locomotive could be a mobile turbine and individual wagons would be fitted with small electric motors. In aviation, the question of when this will happen will be the time when the “non-military” technology becomes the nuclear propulsion of Russian “miracles” and finally, within 20 years of managing the efficiency of photon conversion efficiency in the isotope reactor directly to the electric current, road vehicles could become “eternal electric self-propulsion” ones. So Western civilization is being challenged on how to set up social and health systems after a drop in excise taxes on hydrocarbon fuels as well as pension systems and capital market stability, when energy companies have to change to technology, and acceleration of this process can lead to considerable destabilization of our civilization.
(4) With Philip II of Spain (1527-1598) the golden age of the Spanish Crown is connected and, for example, the Philippines are named in his honor. As a king of Spain, he was extremely cultivated, he supported science and art, but his whole policy was ideologically aimed at promoting Catholicism. In his court, all the ways, as described in the Book of Power/Volunteer Gnosticism, were intertwined, primarily mediated by the Apostle James, who canonized Spain and belonged with his brother John and Peter to the narrowest gnostic circle of Jesus Christ, the Babylonian Jews who have settled in Spain within the diaspora after the destruction of the 2nd Solomon’s Temple by the Romans in the year 70 A. D., but there were also Gnostics presenting their “seeing” from the daughter of Moses and later from the daughter of Sedecia, especially in the northwest of Spain. During the period of Philippi’s rule, Rudolph II of the Habsburg (1552-1612) lived in his court for seven years, who, as the emperor of the Holy Roman Empire of the Nation of Germany, called within his policy of religious tolerance all alchemists and occultists who were not in the court of Philip II religiously conformed to Catholicism in Prague. Subsequently, the Habsburgs, in the course of the counter-reformation during the Thirty Years’ War from Prague, pushed the occultists mostly to Sweden, but about a fifth of them left for Switzerland. To make it easier to grasp the currents of power at the beginning of modern history in Europe, it is appropriate to introduce the term “goy” as used in the Bible by God in an interview with Abraham, where God denotes this person as a person of the future Jewish nation, i.e., the mental man and ethnic genius. Then the power groups ranked according to the age in which they began to be formed are the paragons who wandered through the pilgrimage of the daughter of Moses Scotia and Sedekias daughter Tamar Tefi through northwest Spain, Ireland, Scotland and further spread by the Celts and Vikings through the dispossessed King James II they reached France and the US, while the territory where Christian Protestantism in Europe is ultimately in place corresponds to the territories with a derived, i.e. the non-original propagation of “seeing” the Celts and Vikings. By Cyros II the released Jews from the Babylonian captivity is strictly limited to the Samaritans/Jews who remained in the territory of the former Palestine, and came with a strict interpretation of the written “law of our God” – the Torah. Babylonian Jews, given their privileged position in the Babylonian diaspora, which allows them to live in a learned community, come with an enhanced monotheistic belief, and become a homogeneous elite, without the need for a closer circle of initiates, as opposed to the paragons carrying the ” visions, “the Babylonian Jews are the holders of an integrated “vision and leadership”. Jesus Christ stood strictly on the basis of rabbinical Judaism, despite the fact that some of the authors of heretical texts tried to include him among the Essenes, Jesus by giving the full “leadership” to the ethnic gentile/Christian, in fact, in the sense of the conversation between God and Abraham, he is the “creator” of the Christian nation. The complete “leadership” consists of the knowledge of the Triune God, the role of women in the cultivation of human civilization and the interpretative rules of reality in the demand of strict justice and non-violence. Jesus in his teaching uncompromisingly separates “vision” from “leadership,” where the vision is reserved only to a circle of initiates who are capable of casting responsibility “from vision” and slipping into the trap of superiority to the blind, which is a violation of the principle of justice that is key to finding inner peace, and thus achieving personal happiness. Simultaneous “vision and leadership” requires personal discipline and the highest degree of human personality development, which is described in the book as a simultaneous dialectic of consciousness and will, therefore, for people who are not internally powerful, it must take the form of strict formal rules of “kosher”, which is not a feeling of personal happiness, but similarly to abstinent alcoholic, it mediates full life survival without fatal failure. In view of the attitude of Jesus Christ to Gnosticism and spiritual observation, the Catholic Church also stood firmly against all the Gnostic attempts they tried to enforce in the framework of lay Catholicism, but at the same time the Church did not prevent Christian clerics from dealing with Gnosticism, but this approach led to the last of the power group, they are syncretic goys, who met in the court of Emperor Rudolph II of the Habsburg and eventually ended in Sweden, where they combined with the “second-hand” Gnosticism seen by the former Celts and Vikings, who created the sad concept of agnosticism, i. e., the belief that until God is revealed, we do not know whether he exists or does not exist and only one step more we can claim that God is the product of the human mind and therefore does not exist. The concept of agnosticism is sad because it mediates man’s life of formal knowledge without God, and that is the “Cain blind branch” of mankind’s development, as it is revealed in the book, in the final syncretic goys no longer have “vision” and “leadership” is confined exclusively to material being. The power of “seeing” is that it also enables biological entities that do not have consciousness, so mediation of the “seeing” of the English elite by Babylonian Jews/Venetian bankers in the form of Freemasonry has ensured the mental synchronization that is important for the volition of human effort as the cheapest/most effective method of peace coordination and subordination, at the same time providing a minimum “educational” level for individuals to entrust their capital so as not to sublimate it for the purpose of funding “ideology” or virtual constructions instead of efficient use of capital to accumulate it. The result was the philosophical direction – English Empiricism, which meant the liberation from “virtual reality of the burdens”, for what is true, then non-ideological, should be considered as an expression of consistency with reality. The Babylonian Jews raised the hosts of the English people who were in the 16th century at the end of civilization as a tool of scientific and industrial revolution with which they were able to dominate the world but also actively protected it. The first step was to break the bonds with Christianity that “served” as protection in the diasporic life, but the attractiveness of the trade opened by the Kingdom of Spain, its inefficiency due to the export/financing of ideology, and the inability to pay its obligations meant an opportunity for the “host” nation to become the master of the world, so naturally it had to come to England’s military crash with Spain, which without capital Spain could not win, just like the former Soviet Union 400 years later. The natural consequence was the ending of the political influence of the Catholic Church, which was associated with the expulsion of the English King James II to exile in Paris, along with the Gnostic tradition of the Scottish rite of Freemasonry, but at the same time to prevent the degeneration of society into the “slender Cain’s evolutionary branch of humanity” represented by life in full knowledge but without God, so the elites were bound by faith in the Great Architect of the universe, discussed in the book. In return for capital, vision, elimination of enemies and domination over the world, the Babylonian Jews were given protection and demonstration of loyalty by the English kings, already at the coronation of the English King sitting on a throne that contains the “fate of fortune” of the biblical Patriarch Jacob/Israel. This is the stone on which he slept when he saw the ladder in heaven, where the tribe of the Israelites/his descendants was carried out by the angels. Among other things, all male members of the royal family undertake a circumcision from the London rabbi and are members of the Great Lodge of England. In order to complete the elimination of the Catholic Church as a real political power, “three powers” joined to “dismantle” the Catholic kingdom in France during the Great French Revolution (1789). The last “blow of grace” of the secular power of the Catholic Church was given by Napoleon in the Battle of Austerlitz (1805), where he defeated the combined Austrian-Russian military forces, and from then on Catholics, charismatic Christians, are defensive and did not participate in any war, terrorism or genocide. On the contrary, after solving the “Christian question”, para goys and syncretic goys turned to Germany and the Jews, allowed Hitler to assume power over the occult background, for which Hitler allowed them to survive World War II in neutrality in Sweden and Vichy France. As I have said in the book, the Egyptian royal myth is leading the people out of trust to get into public resources management, especially from people who are emotional black holes or are affected by status obsessions. Emotional para goyish features are associated with the feeling of being “stolen” by the English throne, they are the holders of the same “vision” of power gnosis as the Babylonian Jews, and are the heirs of an older Jewish tradition. The para goys come from the Middle Egyptian Kingdom, which according to the book is a society of “improbus women,” where the peak of personal growth is duty and suppressed emotionality, mistakenly mixed with the drift stemming from the strict application of the Torah in the traditions and customs of the Babylonian Jews, emotionality replaces discipline and morality, but in para goys it creates emotional inaction towards the neighbor. Synchratic goys suffer from “castration syndrome” because, as agnosis, as well as scientific atheism in their mental equipment, causes incompleteness of knowledge, and because they do not want to be “fools” i.e. not to receive the highest “enlightened” social status, so they have to “shout in the crowd” to make sure they are not alone and someone else does not deny them. Therefore, they require permanent signs of loyalty from all around, and therefore they prefer positive discrimination to individuals who cannot be “normal” because they are an indication to them that the syncretic goys are exceptional and have the highest status, as other/handicapped individuals cannot change their status to higher, which confirms the syncretic goys in their “truth”. It is unnecessary to argue about the senselessness and ignorance of the two groups of power; the fruit of their actions is spoken of by them, in the case of World War II of 65 million dead, and in the case of presidents working between Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump, who were from Texas or the Democratic Party, everyone in our planet can make an opinion. The way to know goys is relatively simple because they all act in representation and secrecy, but they always have to co-opt “their man” into the institutional structures of official power, being behind all power, and he is in direct connection with the highest inner/the secret of goys in the given territory, therefore, by recognizing people in a relationship with the “official man of power” in two steps, reveals at least 90% of goys in that State, and it is enough to reveal the identity of two-necks-distance individuals around George Bush Sr.., Francois Mitterrand and the Swedish King Charles XVI Gustav. Among other things, it is necessary to learn from the public signs of preparing for the breakup of society, where para goys, who penetrated into the public administration cause its enormous indebtedness and drawing of these resources through artificially created crises/problems and “virtual public needs” on the eve of the Great French Revolution the public needs of the State were financed up to 78% of the debt, and assisted by the syncretic goys/enlighteners, spreading the ideology of God’s non-existence, proclaiming their own moral superiority as the bearers of progress and suppressing the burdens. A similar situation was in Spain during the reign of Philip II and in the Soviet Union before its collapse, but such a situation was caused by themselves, while the situation in France at the end of the 18th century, in Nazi Germany, and the present US is artificially created. Anyone who ignores the signs of a society’s disintegration should brush off the lessons learned from his or her history or, what is the ultimate goal of trying out goys through a memory of the genocide of about 1.5 million Catholics during the Great French Revolution. A shop window of the “Enlightenment” is illustrated by the fate of Vendée, the most Catholic French province, where French “genocide manager” Jean Carrier was faced with the problem of recruiting people in Vendée who refused to swear at the “civil clergy” because the executions were lengthy and there was also a lack of ” “car carrier developed techniques such as contamination of common arsenic wells, boat trips over the Loire, which was that “he hauled hundreds of Catholics on a ship that had holes in the bottom and those in the middle of the river depopulated, among others, organized “Republican weddings”. When the unclean young boys and girls stripped and tied up and threw them into the Loire River, eventually the historical annals also remembered the quarrels and the appearance of his officers, who had more beautiful trousers sewn or a coat made of the skin of how many more Catholics.